December 8, 2004

Concise Dictionary of the Occult and New Age


Lardie, Debra (Dan Lioy and Paul Ingram, consulting ed’s). Concise Dictionary of the Occult and New Age. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Kregel Publications, 2000. 302pp., $19.99 (cloth).

In the last few decades occultic and New Age terminology and symbolism have become so pervasive that they are essentially ubiquitous in modern society. Christians, as C. S. Lewis once pointed out, deal with such matters in one of two extremes; either complete ignorance or unhealthy preoccupation. Part of the problem for the average Christian or even seminary educated pastor in dealing with these issues is a lack of understanding of the variations within what the editors call the “philosophical kaleidoscope” of occult and New Age manifestations. This being the case the editors have prepared what they call a “unique and concise guide to help Christians navigate the confusing and potentially dangerous minefield of today’s occult and New Age thought” (rear cover).

This work is formatted in easily read type and two-column format. The articles are concise, normally only two or three paragraphs, and there are numerous illustrations which are quite helpful for certain abstract symbols. There are two short appendices (“Knowing the Truth: God’s Word, Cults, and the Occult” and “Scripture Twisting”) which are short, but helpful reminders. Apparently Lardie has written all of the articles, although that is never stated. In the preface by Ingram explains the necessity of the work, but never details the role of the author, the consulting editors, or the methodology employed. This is a deficiency as the author, who has a degree in journalism with a stated interest in the subject, seems to lack the academic credentials for such an undertaking; especially when some articles are designed to “compare historic Christian doctrines with New Age teaching” (p. 9). The work also suffers from the lack of any indexes, a cardinal sin for a reference work.

While many of the articles are helpful there are several noticeable lacks in this work. Most seriously is that there is no bibliography or bibliographic references either within the articles or a cumulative collection. One of the key functions of a reference work is not only to provide summations but also to provide some gateway to additional study or research. Lacking additional references, this volume fails on the second point. A set of sources would also be helpful because several of the articles betray a level of “conspiracy theory” mentality common among some more sensationalist literature (e.g. articles on the United Nations, Values Clarification, Unity in Diversity Council, Trilateral Commission). Some level of reliable background literature would have been useful to dispel this impression. Some articles, such as the one on "Quantum Physics," are so brief (and simplistic) that the reader is left with the impression that the entire scientific discipline is some kind of fraudulent invention of the New Age movement (the article on the String Theory, misnamed in the article as the Superstring Theory suffers from the same problem). The headings on several articles are not well selected. For example the heading “Green” is entirely unhelpful and gives the reader no clue that the article is about the “Green Party,” a socio-political movement and political party active in many countries. Other examples suffering from this problem are the entries for “Peace,” “Drug,” and “Light.” Some articles simply lack obvious detail, such as the failure to even mention Louis Farrakan in the article on the Nation of Islam as the current leader of the movement and the main proponent of the ideas that the article is critical of. Some material, such as the entry on “Unicorn” simply contain erroneous information.

On the helpful side there are an abundance of “see also” references that gives the work a level of cohesion. The writing style is certainly clear and there is undoubtedly a great deal of basic and useful information. However, the items noted above cause this reviewer to have a significant level of concern about the thoroughness and accuracy in this work. The reader will certainly have to look elsewhere to both confirm and expand on the information that is presented.

Posted by Narnia3 at December 8, 2004 7:11 PM | TrackBack
Comments

I had a prof that insisted his class put this book on their "keeper" list. Here it is years later and I still reference to it. Its easy to reference, easy to understand although I have the feeling the author has a lot more to say.

Posted by: Leigh Carleton at October 15, 2006 11:04 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Powered by
Movable Type 4.01

design by blogstyles.